In re Grand Jury November 1989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that “statements set forth in [a party’s] brief, without supporting evidence” are generally insufficient to support, or oppose, a motion for summary judgment
• noting that in South Carolina banks “neither owe[] a duty of care to customers or non-customers.”’
• statements of counsel in a brief are not evidence generally sufficient to survive summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).