Skip to main content
· 10/26/2009

In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Possible Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461

Citations

  • 706 F. Supp. 2d 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “it is not clear what purpose (at least at this stage) would be served by compelling Mr. X to . qualify responsive documents as business records. There is no prohibition against presenting hearsay to the grand jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.