In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Glen J. Schroeder, Jr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a prima facie “showing must have some foundation in fact, for mere allegations of criminality are insufficient to warrant application of the exception.”
• holding crime-fraud exception applied to testimony of attorney and accountant, who prepared his client’s tax returns during grand jury investigation for tax evasion
• explaining that 5 Murdock must also show “subjective knowledge of a risk of serious harm” for his deliberate indifference claim premised on Robinson’s and Palmer’s liability as jail supervisors. See Keith v. DeKalb County, 749 F.3d 1034, 1047–48 (11th Cir. 2014
• court found that the attorney-client privilege did not protect documents given to an attorney for purposes of tax preparation
• evidence that if believed by the trier of fact would establish the elements of some violation that was ongoing or about to be committed
• \The attorney-client privilege attaches only to communications made in confidence to an attorney by that attorney’s client ....\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).