In re Grand Jury 93-1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “requiring the plaintiff to remit so much of the verdict as was in excess of the damages laid in the declaration, was in entire conformity with the law, practice and decisions of the State”
• observing, in reversing judgment on unrelated grounds, that a remittitur granted by the trial court in an amount equal to the excess of the damages awarded over the damages sought was “in entire conformity with the law, practice and decisions of the State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).