In Re Granada, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trustee’s bare assertion that the possibility of estate insolvency was not yet known was insufficient to withhold payment under § 365(d)(3)
• ordering payment of landlord’s post petition, pre rejection claim where the trustee had failed to show that there was a “substantial doubt” that the estate would be administratively solvent
• no super-priority status, but shall pay unless trustee shows “substantial doubt” that there will be enough funds to pay all administrative claims ultimately
• “[U]npaid Section 365(d)(3) expenses do not enjoy a superpriority status over other Section 507(a)(1
• “In the absence of such Congressional direction with regard to section 365(d)(3) claimants, it would be inappropriate to imply the existence of an automatic superpri- ority status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).