In Re Gould Paper Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding SCREENWIPE generic as applied to pre-moistened antistatic cloths for cleaning computer and television screens
• registration is properly denied if \the separate words joined to form a compound have a meaning identical to the meaning common usage would ascribe to those words as a compound\
• SCREENWIPE, a compound term composed of generic words SCREEN and WIPE, itself is generic for “pre-moistened, anti-static cloth for cleaning computer and television screens”
• SCREENWIPE held generic as applied to premoistened antistatic cloths for cleaning computer and television screens
• SCREENWIPE held generic as applied to premoistened antistatic cloths for cleaning computer and television screens
• “Gould has simply joined the two most pertinent and individually generic terms applicable to its product, and then attempts to appropriate the ordinary compound thus created as its trademark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).