In Re Gorman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he limits are not doubled in a joint case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duplessis v. Valenti (In Re Valenti)
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-05-11· cited 22×
• In Re Siegfried
  D. Colorado· 1998-04-24· cited 16×
• In Re Belknap
  W.D. New York· 1994-11-10· cited 6×
• In Re Tomlinson
  E.D. Michigan· 1990-07-13· cited 6×
• In Re Lower
  D. Colorado· 2004-06-28· cited 5×
• In Re Monroe
  D. Arizona· 2002-08-08· cited 3×
• Coastal Bank of Georgia v. Archibald (In Re Archibald)
  S.D. Georgia· 2004-01-27· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Eugene Arthur Day, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-26· cited 48×
• In Re Tucker
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1983-10-27· cited 27×
• In Re Krull
  D. Colorado· 1985-10-17· cited 18×
• Walker v. Roth
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-11-29· cited 7×
• Matter of Volpe
  M.D. Florida· 1985-04-18· cited 2×