In Re Goodman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Bankruptcy Court could not sua sponte modify plan, modification had to be sought by proper party under section 1127(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Poplar Run Five Ltd. Partnership v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. (In Re Poplar Run Five Ltd. Partnership)
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-10-03· cited 45×
• Zahn Associates, Inc. v. Leeds Building Products, Inc. (In Re Leeds Building Products, Inc.)
  N.D. Georgia· 1993-11-03· cited 16×
• In Re Albrecht
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-03-07· cited 15×
• In Re Walker
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-06-06· cited 10×
• In Re Planet Hollywood International
  D. Delaware· 2001-10-19· cited 8×
• Diagnostic International, Inc. v. Aerobic Life Products Co. (In Re Diagnostic International, Inc.)
  D. Arizona· 2000-10-26· cited 7×
• Frisia Hartley, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Talsma)
  N.D. Texas· 2014-04-15· cited 6×
• Cavazos v. Mid-State Trust II (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)
  M.D. Florida· 2001-09-28· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
  Fifth Circuit· 1953-10-19· cited 85×
• Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin
  Second Circuit· 1932-08-23· cited 77×
• Goodman v. Phillip R. Curtis Enterprises, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1987-01-08· cited 49×
• Knight v. Wertheim & Co.
  Second Circuit· 1946-12-31· cited 20×
• Chase v. Austrian
  Fourth Circuit· 1951-06-04· cited 9×
• Hardison v. Weinshel
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1978-05-25· cited 5×