In re Gold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the attorney violated the New York equivalent of MARPC 19-301.8 by borrowing $57,000 from a former client and representing both borrower and lender in the transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Dranov
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-28· cited 25×
• In re Ioannou
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-11-10· cited 13×
• In re Jones
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-01-27· cited 5×
• In re Goldsmith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-02-17· cited 4×
• Matter of Stasiuk
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-08-15· cited 2×
• Matter of Murray-Nolan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2026-05-28· cited 1×
• Matter of Bhalla
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-06-13
• In re Rosen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-11-13
• In re Baldinger
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-07-02
• Attorney Grievance v. Dailey
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-03-18

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In re Reiss
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-07-31· cited 67×