Fifth Circuit· 4/25/2001
In Re: Goff
Citations
- 250 F.3d 273
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7461
- 2001 WL 422053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]neffective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction proceeding cannot serve as cause to excuse procedural default in a federal habeas proceeding.”
- “[I]neffective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction proceeding cannot serve as cause to excuse procedural default in a federal habeas proceeding.”
- “[I]neffective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction proceeding cannot serve as cause to excuse procedural default in a federal habeas proceeding.”
- “[I]neffective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction proceeding cannot serve as cause to excuse procedural default in a federal habeas proceeding.”
- “[T]he Supreme Court has spoken quite explicitly on this subject . . .and has repeatedly emphasized that ineffective assistance of counsel in a post- conviction proceeding cannot serve as cause to excuse default in a federal habeas proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Smith, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-08· cited 887×
- Elizalde v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-03-08· cited 648×
- Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-02· cited 193×
- Woodfox v. FotiFifth Circuit· 2010-06-24· cited 138×
- Anthony Graves v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 2003-08-15· cited 109×
- Matchett v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-08-09· cited 59×
- Haynes v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2008-04-23· cited 56×
- Hatten v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-06-05· cited 49×
- Pursell v. HornW.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-02-01· cited 34×
- In Re BeasleyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24· cited 30×
- Stevens v. EppsFifth Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 19×
- Moody v. LumpkinFifth Circuit· 2023-06-16· cited 9×
- Graves v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 2003-08-15· cited 7×
- Wood v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2005-08-24· cited 5×
- Blanton v. QuartermanW.D. Texas· 2007-06-01· cited 5×
- Woodfox v. FotiFifth Circuit· 2010-07-01· cited 1×
- Woodfox v. FotiFifth Circuit· 2010-07-15· cited 1×
- Woodfox v. FotiFifth Circuit· 2010-07-16· cited 1×
- in Re Jerry Dwight BeasleyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24
- Michael Frischenmeyer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-05-16
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Goff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-22· cited 405×
- Callins v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1996-07-12· cited 38×
- Eugene Welch v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1966-03-28· cited 24×
- Irving v. HargettFifth Circuit· 1995-07-20· cited 23×
- Goff v. TexasSupreme Court· 1997-04-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.