In Re Godt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where there existed a similar conflict, the TAA controlled where there was no evidence demonstrating that attorney-client agreement related to interstate commerce.
• holding that, where there existed a similar conflict, the TAA controlled where there was no evidence demonstrating that attorney-client agreement related to interstate commerce.
• declining to apply the FAA because there was no evidence that the attorney/client agreement related to interstate commerce
• arbitration provision was not enforceable because the client did not act on the advice of independent counsel, nor did independent counsel sign the agreement
• arbitration provision was not enforceable Fairfield County, Case No. 13 CA 42 10 because the client did not act on the advice of independent counsel, nor did independent counsel sign the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).