District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/21/1990
In Re Godfrey
Citations
- 583 A.2d 692
- 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 320
- 1990 WL 211443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence as to time of misappropriation was wholly within respondent's ability to produce and his testimony on this matter is speculative, entitling it to little weight
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Farrell, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re StanbackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 17×
- In Re LenoirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-03-03· cited 14×
- In Re MarlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 4×
- In Re BerkowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-06-13· cited 4×
- In re DiuguidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-27· cited 1×
- In re MasseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-18· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.