In Re GMA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• burden of proof generally falls upon the party seeking a change in the status quo [citing 29 Am.Jur.2d, Evidence § 158]
• burden of proof generally falls upon the party seeking a change in the status quo [citing 29 Am. Jur. 2d, Evidence § 158]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of K.E.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-16· cited 37×
• In Re Ke
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-16

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Killman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 160×
• Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-15· cited 88×
• State v. Vega-Fuentes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 59×
• Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 58×
• State v. Engles
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 55×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-04-01· cited 32×
• Glassman v. Costello
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 23×
• Nora H. Ringler Revocable Family Trust v. Meyer Land and Cattle Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-05-22· cited 18×
• Witschner v. City of Atchison
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1941-10-11· cited 12×
• In Re the Marriage of Gordon-Hanks
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-08-25· cited 10×
• In re G.M.A.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-04-12· cited 10×
• Clanton v. Estivo
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-07-30· cited 9×
• In the Interest of R. P.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-01-29· cited 6×