Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/17/2022
In re G.M.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3687
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err in granting the agency's motion for permanent custody where the children had been in the custody of the agency for more than 12 months of a consecutive 22-month period, and the evidence at the hearing established a grant of permanent custody to the agency was in the children's best interest.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re D.K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
- In re G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
- In re M.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 64×
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 63×
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-11· cited 62×
- In re S.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 57×
- In re D.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 43×
- In re R.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-07· cited 39×
- In re M.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-30· cited 35×
- In re C.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-14· cited 35×
- In re A.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 33×
- In re K.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 26×
- In re I.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-06· cited 19×
- In re L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.