Skip to main content

In re G.M.

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5398

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in granting permanent custody of a child to an agency when the parents were not able to safely care for the child. The second motion for permanent custody alleging new grounds was not a factor because the trial court found alternate grounds under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a). A new statute that became effective after the permanent custody hearing began does not impose new duties. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.