In Re Globe Newspaper Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly closed the portions of a bail hearing that included electronic surveillance materials not yet determined to have been legally obtained
• holding that fruits of an electronic surveillance should not be publicly disseminated until the defendant has had the opportunity to challenge the legality of the Title III surveillance
• stating that both Title III and the Fourth Amendment forbid the use or public dissemination of the fruits of unlawfully obtained Title III material
• recognizing right but holding that defendant’s right to a fair trial and privacy outweighed the public’s right of access
• requiring a trial court that rejects alternatives to sealing to make specific findings to facilitate appellate review
• affirming closure of proceedings and sealing of documents involving possibly inadmissible electronic surveillance evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).