Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

In Re Global Home Products, LLC

Citations

  • 369 B.R. 778
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 758
  • 2007 WL 689747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating an incentive plan under the business judgment standard of section 363 by applying the factors listed above
  • evaluating an incentive plan under the business judgment standard of section 36B by applying the factors listed above
  • “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel or is not in the nature of severance.”
  • “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel or is not in the nature of severance.”
  • “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel.... ”
  • “The court [in Dana], citing numerous cases, listed the factors courts use to determine . . . if the structure of a compensation proposal and the process for developing the proposal meet the ‘sound business judgment’ test . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kevin Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.