· 3/6/2007
In Re Global Home Products, LLC
Citations
- 369 B.R. 778
- 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 758
- 2007 WL 689747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evaluating an incentive plan under the business judgment standard of section 363 by applying the factors listed above
- evaluating an incentive plan under the business judgment standard of section 36B by applying the factors listed above
- “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel or is not in the nature of severance.”
- “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel or is not in the nature of severance.”
- “The entire analysis changes if a bonus plan is not primarily motivated to retain personnel.... ”
- “The court [in Dana], citing numerous cases, listed the factors courts use to determine . . . if the structure of a compensation proposal and the process for developing the proposal meet the ‘sound business judgment’ test . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kevin Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.