In Re Glinz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nunc pro tunc orders may be granted even if failure to comply with section 327 is a function of “mere unintended oversight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re NWFX, Inc.
  W.D. Arkansas· 2001-06-22· cited 16×
• In Re Westside Creek Ltd. Partnership
  E.D. Arkansas· 1988-08-09· cited 15×
• Tarkio College v. Bower (In Re Tarkio College)
  W.D. Missouri· 1992-02-18· cited 10×
• In re Calkins
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1992-08-20· cited 1×
• United States Trustee for the Western District of New York v. Gross, Shuman, Brizdle & Gilfillan, P.C. (In re Platinum Management Corp.)
  W.D. New York· 1998-10-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, Trustee
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-02-18· cited 207×
• In Re Eureka Upholstering Co.
  Second Circuit· 1931-04-06· cited 95×
• In the Matter of Ralph E. Stolkin, Debtor. Ralph E. Stolkin v. Norman H. Nachman, Ralph E. Stolkin v. Joseph H. Schwartz and Malcolm M. Gaynor
  Seventh Circuit· 1973-01-18· cited 42×
• In Re King Elec. Co., Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1982-04-14· cited 37×
• In Re Mork
  D. Minnesota· 1982-05-07· cited 37×
• Albers v. Dickinson
  Eighth Circuit· 1942-04-29· cited 35×
• In Re Johnson
  District of Columbia· 1982-06-24· cited 25×
• In Re Rene Press, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1982-09-23· cited 16×