In Re Gladys L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining why California’s dependency system comports with due process because by the time parent rights are terminated, “the juvenile court must have made prior findings that the parent was unfit” (emphasis in original)
• explaining why California’s dependency system comports with due process because by the time parent rights are terminated, “the juvenile court must have made prior findings that the parent was unfit” (emphasis in original)
• explaining why California’s dependency system comports with due process because 21 by the time parent rights are terminated, “the juvenile court must have made prior findings that the parent was unfit” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Jason J.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-07-09· cited 151×
• San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Scott F.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-07· cited 82×
• Tehama County Department of Social Services v. L.K.
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-10-25· cited 53×
• In Re Vincent M.
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-04-04· cited 51×
• San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Joseph S.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-12-17· cited 36×
• Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Frank R.
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-01-13· cited 32×
• Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Gerardo R.
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-01-08· cited 30×
• Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Robert A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-10-02· cited 27×
• Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. D.H. (In re D.H.)
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-22· cited 13×
• In Re PA
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-10-02· cited 1×
• Jorge C. v. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-04-04· cited 1×
• San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Willie S.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-07-09· cited 1×
• In Re Vf
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-07
• In Re As
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-12-17
• In Re Gsr
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-01-08
• In re D.H.
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-08-22
• In re S.S.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-10-02
• In re Christopher L.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-02
• In re Christopher L.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-12
• In re Christopher L.
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• Cynthia D. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 437×
• In Re Marquis D.
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-10-16· cited 116×
• Fresno County Department of Children & Family Services v. Gerardo A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-06-24· cited 28×
• Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Alex C.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-07-25· cited 1×