In Re Girardi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although “carelessly, negligently, or unreasonably multiplying the proceedings is not” vexatious, “recklessly or intentionally misl[eading] the court” is vexatious, as is “recklessly rais[ing] a frivolous argument”
• sanctioning counsel for attempting to enforce foreign money judgment that “named the wrong defendant” despite knowing that “the discrepancy could doom any enforcement action”
• “misrepresenting facts,” “making frivolous filings,” and violating “§ 1927’s duty to correct or withdraw litigation positions after it becomes obvious that they are meritless”
• in which the entire “litigation was based on . . . falsehoods,” which were asserted “knowingly, intentionally, and recklessly”
• Attorneys have a “duty [under Section 1927] to correct or withdraw litigation 5 positions after it becomes obvious that they are meritless.”
• alteration in the State of Texas and U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Evid. Hr’g Tr. vol. 3, 758 (Testimony of Donald Hagans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).