In re: Gieswein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “engage in the difficult legal analysis that can be required to determine questions of retroactivity in the first instance” and determining that no Supreme Court holding requires, “by strict logical necessity,” that Johnson apply retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).