New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/19/1931
In Re Gibson
Citations
- 4 P.2d 643
- 35 N.M. 550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that findings and recommendations in disciplinary proceeding are considered recommendatory in character with plenary power in the Supreme Court to examine the entire case anew and render judgment as the facts warrant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sadler, Bickley, Watson, Parker, Hudspeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 710×
- Angarano v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-12-02· cited 67×
- State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-08-30· cited 55×
- Hutcheson v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1940-01-13· cited 42×
- State Bar of Michigan v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court· 1960-09-16· cited 28×
- White v. Board of Education of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-01-24· cited 23×
- Ford v. Board of Tax-Roll CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1967-04-11· cited 22×
- State v. SilverNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-07-23· cited 20×
- Vigil v. Penitentiary of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1948-07-19· cited 20×
- In Re PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-02-15· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Sanchez v. StapletonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-11-04· cited 16×
- Clovis National Bank v. CallawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-08-30· cited 13×
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of the StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-09-30· cited 12×
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1954-11-23· cited 8×
- Wiggs v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-04-04· cited 6×
- Brockman v. Contractors Licensing BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-06-30· cited 6×
- Mississippi State Bar v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Eckles v. LivermoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-20· cited 5×
- In Re HadwigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1933-12-05· cited 5×
- Youree v. EllisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1954-01-07· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 158×
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court· 1918-05-11· cited 98×
- Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court· 1881-11-15· cited 49×
- In Re ScottNevada Supreme Court· 1930-10-15· cited 30×
- Harrington v. AtteberryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-07-15· cited 23×
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Board of Directors of Levee District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1912-02-05· cited 19×
- Abraham v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court· 1909-12-14· cited 17×
- State v. FourchySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1901-11-15· cited 17×
- Looney v. StrykerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-08-02· cited 16×
- State v. KlectzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-04-26· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs of State Bar v. KikerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-11-01· cited 8×
- Kelley v. State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1931-04-28· cited 7×
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of OlsonWashington Supreme Court· 1921-06-21· cited 7×
- In Re RoyallNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-05-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.