In re George F. Redmond & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiffs “ha[ve] the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the [defendants] ‘violated a definite and specific order of the court requiring [them] to perform or refrain from performing a particular act or acts with knowledge of the court’s order.’ ”
• requiring clear and convincing evidence of noncompliance to hold a party in civil contempt
• requiring clear and convincing evidence of noncompliance to hold a party in civil contempt
• “Willfulness is not an element 6 of civil contempt, so the intent of a party to disobey a court order is ‘irrelevant to the validity of [a] contempt finding.’”
• further quoting NLRB v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc., 829 F.2d 585, 591 (6th Cir. 1987)
• defendant appealed lower court’s finding of contempt for violating a consent permanent injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).