Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 14 injured individual has burden of proof to establish both 15 causation and damages
• holding that 14 injured individual has burden of proof to establish both 15 causation and damages
• noting that “the text of the statute” does not define “actual damages”
• stating that an individual must “demonstrate a causal connection be tween that significant harm and the violation of the automatic stay (as distinct, for instance, from the anxiety and pressures inherent in the bankruptcy process)”
• noting that “the text of the statute” does not define “actual damages”
• noting that “the text of the statute” does not define “actual damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).