In re Gentry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that firearms intended for hunting or self-protection were exempt, but an antique gun collection was not exempt
• implying a gun collection could be useful, convenient to a reasonable existence, or necessary if the collection was intended for hunting or self-protection purposes
• reviewing the debtors’ intended use for specific guns within a collection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Victor D. McGreevy Darlene A. McGreevy Debtors. Darlene A. McGreevy v. Itt Financial Services
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-02-05· cited 26×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-07-10· cited 22×
• Boyer v. ITT Financial Services (In Re Boyer)
  E.D. Missouri· 1986-01-21· cited 16×
• In Re Ray
  E.D. Missouri· 1988-02-24· cited 14×
• In Re Gray
  W.D. Missouri· 1988-06-20· cited 12×
• Oswald v. ITT Financial Services
  W.D. Missouri· 1986-04-23· cited 11×
• In Re Bowen
  E.D. Missouri· 1988-01-27· cited 9×
• Bryan v. Stanton (In Re Bryan)
  Eighth Circuit· 2012-03-21· cited 9×
• In Re Zieg
  W.D. Missouri· 2009-05-07· cited 6×
• In Re McCain
  E.D. Missouri· 1990-04-20· cited 5×
• In Re Maloney
  W.D. Missouri· 2004-07-01· cited 4×
• In Re Coffman
  W.D. Missouri· 1991-03-25· cited 3×
• In re Thompson
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-12-05· cited 3×