In re Gelnovatch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The determination of whether a claimed method is a ‘process’ within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101 is unaffected by the particular apparatus for carrying out the method.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Diamond v. Diehr
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
• In Re Ralph R. Grams and Dennis C. Lezotte
  Federal Circuit· 1989-11-03· cited 39×
• In Re Rex D. Schrader and Eugene D. Klingaman
  Federal Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 28×
• Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1983-06-21· cited 25×
• In re Walter
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1980-03-27· cited 24×
• In re Maucorps
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-11-01· cited 17×
• In re Bradley
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-07-05· cited 10×
• In re Pardo
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1982-08-05· cited 9×
• In re Diehr
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-08-09· cited 8×
• In re Phillips
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-11-15· cited 4×
• In re Phillips
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-03-23· cited 4×
• State Street Bank and Trust Company v. Signature Financial Group
  D. Massachusetts· 1996-03-26· cited 3×
• Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Famous Supply Corp.
  N.D. Ohio· 1999-07-06· cited 3×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City
  Supreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
• United States v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 544×
• Gottschalk v. Benson
  Supreme Court· 1972-11-20· cited 442×
• Parker v. Flook
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 347×
• Lowe v. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 335×
• Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1972-05-30· cited 205×
• Dann v. Johnston
  Supreme Court· 1976-03-31· cited 105×
• In re Freeman
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-03-30· cited 50×
• In re Chatfield
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1976-11-18· cited 44×
• In re Richman
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 29×
• In re Christensen
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-05-31· cited 26×
• In re Johnson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-12-07· cited 20×
• In re Benson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-05-06· cited 19×
• In re Flook
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-08-04· cited 16×
• In re Sarkar
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-12-07· cited 16×
• In re Deutsch
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-05-05· cited 14×
• In re de Castelet
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 13×
• In re Toma
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-18· cited 13×
• In re Waldbaum
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-07-28· cited 11×
• In re Sarkar
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-11· cited 11×