· 11/4/1899
In re Geister
Citations
- 97 F. 322
- 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that board review under § 1552 was not required for district court to adjudicate military member’s conscientious objection claim because “§ 1552 was not intended to affect judicial jurisdiction”
- where record has already been made, only legal questions remain
- essence of exhaustion doctrine is flexibility
- essence of exhaustion doctrine is flexibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shiras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.