Skip to main content
· 11/4/1899

In re Geister

Citations

  • 97 F. 322
  • 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that board review under § 1552 was not required for district court to adjudicate military member’s conscientious objection claim because “§ 1552 was not intended to affect judicial jurisdiction”
  • where record has already been made, only legal questions remain
  • essence of exhaustion doctrine is flexibility
  • essence of exhaustion doctrine is flexibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shiras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.