In re G.C.B.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 74
Syllabus
Appellant's brief does not comport with App.R.16(A)(7) no transcript filed, presume regularity. The appellant did not participate in proceedings, yet challenged violations of due process and fair trial without any legal authority failure to prosecute dismissal of motions, affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Bazelon suggesting that ineffectiveness of counsel at sentencing, defined by reference to the ABA Standards, should be remedied by a remand for resentencing
- dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Bazelon suggesting that ineffectiveness of counsel at sentencing, defined by reference to the ABA Standards, should be remedied by a remand for resentencing
- error in instruction held harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; defendant’s behavior belied claim of intoxication, for he had lunged six feet to inflict an accurate and nearly fatal knife wound
- error in instruction held harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; defendant's behavior belied claim of intoxication, for he had lunged six feet to inflict an accurate and nearly fatal knife wound
- we must “determin[e] whether the error meant the difference between acquittal and conviction.”
- “strong evidence supports a finding of no prejudice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.