In Re Gaumer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• correcting un-updated cross-reference after finding no indication in legislative history that any substantive change was intended by relocation of referent
• “The omission of § 507(a)(7) from the proscription embodied in § 507(d) was the result of a technical or typographical error in the statute.”
• “The omission of § 507(a)(7) from the proscription embodied in § 507(d) was the result of a technical or typographical error in the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).