N.D. New York· 8/10/1995
In Re Gates
Citations
- 187 B.R. 426
- 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1503
- 1995 WL 613425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where there are two inconsistent judgments and each would be entitled to preclusive effect if it stood alone, the later judgment controls in a third action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stephen D. Gerling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 677×
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 395×
- C. Russell Kelleran, Jr., Eighteen Mile Corporation v. Slavko Andrijevic, A/K/A Al AndrieSecond Circuit· 1987-08-04· cited 168×
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LitmanSupreme Court· 1988-01-11· cited 140×
- Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Co.Second Circuit· 1977-04-06· cited 108×
- Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-30· cited 49×
- Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 41×
- Daniel B. Southard v. Margaret F. Southard, Also Known as Margaret F. GrahamSecond Circuit· 1962-07-23· cited 40×
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. District 5, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-30· cited 39×
- Bedford v. BedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-03· cited 28×
- In Re KovalchickE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-12-14· cited 17×
- William A. Porter v. W. Francis WilsonNinth Circuit· 1970-04-06· cited 14×
- Frances Ackerman v. Martin S. AckermanSecond Circuit· 1982-04-07· cited 12×
- Ackerman v. AckermanS.D. New York· 1981-07-03· cited 12×
- Kohn v. Leavitt-Berner Tanning Corp.N.D. New York· 1993-08-18· cited 11×
- Rosenstiel v. RosenstielS.D. New York· 1973-12-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.