In Re: Gary Sinise Foundation v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal due process is violated when a sentence is imposed on the basis of “misinformation of constitutional magnitude”
• holding that federal due process is violated when a sentence is imposed on the basis of \misinformation of constitutional magnitude\
• holding that prisoner sentenced on basis of two prior unconstitutional convictions had to be resentenced
• holding that a sentencing judge violates a person's rights when it considers vacated convictions when imposing its sentence
• holding that sentence based in part on invalid uncounseled misdemeanor convictions violates Sixth Amendment
• concluding that the sentencing transcript demonstrated the district court gave explicit consideration to the inaccurate number of previous convictions, and also actually relied on inaccurate information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).