Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 10/21/2003

In Re Garnett

Citations

  • 303 B.R. 274
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24109
  • 2003 WL 23000941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that retention of jurisdiction was not warranted where “comity was not served by the Bankruptcy Court’s purported exercise of jurisdiction . . . as the state court action had been fully litigated and was . . . on the very verge of resolution”
  • “Thus the filing of the petition commences the case, which has the effect under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d) of vesting exclusive jurisdiction over the property of the debtor and of the estate in the district court, and hence the bankruptcy court, in which the petition is filed.”
  • discussing Sections 349(b)(3) and 362(c)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seybert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.