In re Garlington
Citations
- 115 F. 999
- 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257
Syllabus
<p>Bankruptcy — Provable Debts — Collection Pee Stipulated in Note.</p> <p>Under Bankr. Act 1898, § 63a, providing that “debts of a bankrupt may be proved and allowed against his estate which are (1) a fixed liability as evidenced by a judgment or an instrument in writing absolutely owing at the time of the filing of the petition,” etc., attorney’s fees stipulated for in a note “in case it shall be placed in the hands of an attorney for collection” cannot be proved as a part of the debt, where the note had not matured at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy against the maker.</p>
Judges: Meek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- British & American Mortgage Co. v. StuartFifth Circuit· 1914-01-06· cited 14×
- In Re HaginE.D. Louisiana· 1927-07-25· cited 13×
- In re Keeton, Steele & Co.W.D. Texas· 1903-12-22· cited 6×
- In re AdamsD. Massachusetts· 1904-05-20· cited 4×
- In re GebhardM.D. Pennsylvania· 1905-09-25· cited 4×
- In re JenkinsW.D. South Carolina· 1912-01-09· cited 4×
- In re Black Diamond Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1908-03-27· cited 1×
- In re Reading Hosiery Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1909-06-30· cited 1×
- In re HarrisM.D. Pennsylvania· 1921-05-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.