Customs and Patent Appeals· 4/5/1973
In re Gardner
Citations
- 475 F.2d 1389
- 177 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 396
- 1973 CCPA LEXIS 389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an original claim sufficiently described itself, and that \[n]othing more is necessary for compliance with the description requirement of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almond, Baldwin, Lane, Markey, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-22· cited 436×
- In re Abcor Development Corp.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-12-14· cited 156×
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Federal Circuit· 2002-07-15· cited 94×
- In re SmithCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-08-02· cited 43×
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonD. Delaware· 1980-02-28· cited 26×
- University of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.Federal Circuit· 2004-07-02· cited 24×
- In re KollerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-01-24· cited 22×
- In re EdwardsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-01-12· cited 20×
- Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order]Federal Circuit· 2006-01-05· cited 18×
- In re GardnerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-06-14· cited 15×
- In re EyndeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-07-19· cited 12×
- In re JollesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-07-31· cited 12×
- In re Nguyen Dinh-NguyenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-02-28· cited 11×
- In re BundyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-02-26· cited 9×
- United States v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.D. New Jersey· 1981-02-11· cited 5×
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 2002-07-15· cited 2×
- Liburd v. PlatzerVirgin Islands· 1990-04-24· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-15· cited 46×
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-07-01· cited 29×
- Application of Jean Clement Louis FoucheCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-22· cited 22×
- In re AndersonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-01-26· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.