Skip to main content
· 8/27/2003

In Re Fritz Companies Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 282 F. Supp. 2d 1105
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18008
  • 2003 WL 22160354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding 24 undue delay when the plaintiffs “offered [no] reasonable explanation for the extraordinary lapse” 25 of three years between the Ninth Circuit’s remand of the court’s dismissal of the complaint and the 26 motion for leave to amend
  • “Indicators of 26 prejudice include a need to reopen discovery or the addition of complaints or parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.