In re Friedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he recovery may be such that what was in the first instance a fair contract becomes unfair in its enforcement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gair v. Peck
  New York Court of Appeals· 1959-05-28· cited 108×
• Pocius v. Halvorsen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-11-26· cited 76×
• McKenzie Construction, Inc. v. Desmond L. Maynard
  Third Circuit· 1985-03-25· cited 52×
• Arthur Krause v. James A. Rhodes, Sindell, Lowe & Guidubaldi, a Partnership, Attorney General of Ohio, Intervenor
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-03-27· cited 46×
• Edward C. KING, Appellant, v. Lawrence A. FOX, Appellee
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 30×
• 520 East 72nd Commercial Corp. v. 520 East 72nd Owners Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1988-07-20· cited 17×
• Murray v. Waring Hat Manufacturing Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1911-01-27· cited 14×
• Ransom v. Ransom
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1911-12-29· cited 12×
• Wade v. Clemmons
  New York Supreme Court· 1975-12-03· cited 12×
• Ransom v. Ransom
  New York Supreme Court· 1910-12-15· cited 6×
• Friedman v. Mindlin
  City of New York Municipal Court· 1915-08-15· cited 5×
• Brandes v. Zingmond
  New York Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 4×
• Wojcik v. Miller Bakeries Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1957-04-12· cited 3×
• Rodgers v. Sound of Music Co.
  New York Supreme Court· 1971-07-23· cited 3×
• McCoy v. Gas Engine & Power Co.
  New York Supreme Court· 1911-04-15· cited 1×
• Grossgold v. Lolis
  New York Supreme Court· 1957-08-23· cited 1×
• In re Hayes
  New York Surrogate's Court· 2017-03-17
• In re Friedman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1910-04-22