In Re: Francis P
Citations
- 532 S.W.3d 356
Syllabus
The appellant, Tony P., filed a \Complaint and Petition to Terminate Parental Rights and/or for Adoption\ in the Circuit Court for McMinn County (\trial court\) on September 18, 2015. This petition sought to terminate the parental rights of the \unknown father\ of a child for whom Tony P. had signed a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity (\VAP\). Jon F. filed a motion to intervene, asserting that he was the biological father of the child. The trial court allowed Jon F. to intervene in the action pursuant to an agreed order. The child's mother later filed a motion seeking to dismiss Tony P.'s petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. By oral motion, Jon F. joined with the mother in seeking dismissal. The trial court entered a Memorandum and Order on August 15, 2016, finding that (1) Jon F. was the biological and legal father of the child, (2) Tony P.'s VAP had been rebutted, and (3) any and all parental rights of Tony P. as legal father were \terminated by operation of law under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-102(28)(C).\ The trial court entered a subsequent order dismissing the petition filed by Tony P. Tony P. timely appealed. Having determined that the trial court properly found that Jon F. challenged and rebutted the VAP executed by Tony P., we conclude that Tony P. no longer enjoyed any parental rights with regard to the child. Although we determine that the trial court erred by applying Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-1-102(28)(C) retrospectively to this action filed before the statutory subsection's enactment, we determine this error to be harmless inasmuch as Tony P.'s parental rights were a nullity. We therefore modify the judgment to reflect that Tony P. had no parental rights to be terminated following the court's rescission of the VAP. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of Tony P.'s petition seeking termination of Jon F.'s parental rights. We decline to award fees and costs to the mother an
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court properly dismissed petition to terminate and/or adopt child when petition only sought to terminate father’s parental rights, not mother’s rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frierson, Swiney, Susano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- In Re Audrey S.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-07· cited 1,098×
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-01-29· cited 732×
- Jones v. GarrettTennessee Supreme Court· 2002-12-30· cited 708×
- In Re Bernard T.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 702×
- In re M.A.R.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-08-11· cited 541×
- Young v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-09-16· cited 506×
- In re M.L.P.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2009-03-27· cited 471×
- Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2002-03-25· cited 461×
- In Re Frr, IIITennessee Supreme Court· 2006-05-08· cited 451×
- In Re DrinnonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-12-30· cited 407×
- Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-09-27· cited 261×
- O'DANIEL v. MessierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-04-05· cited 252×
- Keisling v. KeislingTennessee Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 206×
- State Ex Rel. Cihlar v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-22· cited 113×
- Nutt v. Champion International Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-12-07· cited 106×
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-03-22· cited 95×
- In re D.A.H.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-08-27· cited 85×
- Morris v. GrossTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-10-27· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.