In Re Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the exemption would be allowed because the debtor did not voluntarily abandon her residence but was forced to leave the property due to extensive hurricane damage, and she intended to use the house as a residence once repairs were made
• debtor residing in camper when house was destroyed, but continued to pay property taxes, and had plan to hire a contractor and use her son’s financial assistance to rebuild house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Britt
  E.D. North Carolina· 2007-04-26· cited 2×
• In re Vaughn
  D. Alaska· 2016-09-29· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Love
  E.D. North Carolina· 1984-09-20· cited 18×
• In Re Herr
  S.D. Florida· 1996-06-28· cited 8×
• Lee v. Moseley
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1888-09-15· cited 8×
• In Re Cain
  M.D. North Carolina· 1998-03-17· cited 7×