In Re Forecaster Energy Technology, LLC v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969) not to be retroactive
• \the use of such a `condemned practice' in past criminal trials presents substantial likelihood that the results of a number of those trials were factually incorrect\
• “the use of such a ‘condemned practice’ in past criminal trials presents substantial likelihood that the results of a number of those trials were factually incorrect”
• White, J., quoting W.V. Schaefer, The Control of \Sunbursts\: Techniques of Prospective Overruling, 42 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 631, 645 (1967)
• petitioners were duly convicted when judged by the then-existing law; the authorities did not violate their rights before or at trial
• petitioners were duly convicted when judged by the then-existing law; the authorities did not violate their rights before or at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).