in Re Ford Motor Company and Ken Stoepel Ford, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restricting additional discovery did not unduly inhibit discovery of experts’ potential bias because direct evidence from experts was most probative evidence
• directing trial court to vacate order seeking financial and business information for all the cases the employer of the expert witness had handled for Ford during a twelve year period
• request for “detailed financial and business information for all cases the companies have handled for Ford or any other automobile manufacturer from 2000 to 2011” was overbroad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).