Skip to main content
· 12/22/2008

In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA Litigation

Citations

  • 590 F. Supp. 2d 883
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107392
  • 2008 WL 5377955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Complaint adequately stated a claim for breach of the “fiduciary duty to monitor”
  • determining whether a Plan is an ESOP by reviewing the terms of the Plan
  • “Twombly did not replace Rule 8(a)’s notice pleading requirement with a new civil procedure that requires plaintiffs to satisfy an evidentiary burden before evidence is developed in a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen J. Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.