In re Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is the court's duty \to control and safeguard the estates of minors under their charge\ and no removal petition is required for the court to exercise its duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Estate of Boeving
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1965-02-18· cited 28×
• In Re Dugan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1957-12-17· cited 25×
• In Re Estate of Pittman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-02-22· cited 15×
• Coffelt v. Hunt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-06-20· cited 5×
• In Re Estate of Snider
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-01-26· cited 1×
• Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Davis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1957-12-17· cited 1×
• White v. Little
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-01-26· cited 1×
• In re Guardianship of Jones
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2023-07-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State ex rel. McManus v. Muench
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1909-03-09· cited 52×
• Estate of Meeker v. Swift
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1891-05-05· cited 21×
• Sidwell v. Jett
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1908-07-14· cited 13×
• Jenkins v. Morrow
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1908-06-08· cited 12×
• City of St. Louis v. Hollrah
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1903-05-27· cited 12×
• Estate of Padgett v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1905-10-17· cited 9×
• Carter v. Wamack & Staggs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1896-01-06· cited 5×
• Grant v. Stubblefield
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1909-06-22· cited 5×