Skip to main content
· 1/12/2012

In Re Flatt-Moore

Citations

  • 959 N.E.2d 241
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 4
  • 2012 WL 98517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although crime victims may be allowed to have “meaningful input into plea agreements,” prosecutors are ethically prohibited from surrendering control of the plea bargaining process to victims
  • holding that a defendant may consent in a plea agreement to pay restitution in excess of that provided by statute, but that it is unethical for a prosecutor to allow crime victim complete control of plea negotiations with respect to restitution amount
  • “A criminal defendant is not entitled to a plea offer of any sort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.