In Re Fitch, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, American Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[u]nlike a business newspaper or magazine, which would cover any transactions deemed newsworthy, Fitch only ‘covers’ its own clients”
• “Unlike a business newspaper or magazine, which would cover any trans- actions deemed newsworthy, Fitch only ‘covers’ its own clients.”
• Motions to compel are “entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court.”
• “Fitch’s information-disseminating activity does not seem to be based on a judgment about newsworthiness, but rather on client needs. We believe this weighs against Fitch being able to assert the privilege for the information at issue.”
• “‘A trial court enjoys wide discretion in its handling of pre-trial discovery, and its rulings with regard to discovery are reversed only upon a clear showing of an abuse of discretion.’” (quoting In re DG Acquisition Corp., 151 F.3d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).