In re F.G.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5709
Syllabus
Permanent custody; parental rights; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1); R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); R.C. 2151.414(E); R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); clear and convincing evidence; manifest weight; best interests of the children. Judgment affirmed. The trial court's decisions to deny appellant's motions for permanent custody, terminate temporary custody, and award legal custody to Mother were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The agency did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that it was in the best interest of the children to grant permanent custody to the agency.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re the Interest of R. J. C.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-04-09· cited 118×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 30×
- In re D.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-11· cited 13×
- In re B.B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-15· cited 12×
- In re Ja.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.