In Re Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that without the express agreement of priority claim holders, the proposed plan failed to comport with Section 1322(a)(2), and thus could not be confirmed under Section 1325(a)(1)
• rejecting chapter 13 plan for proposal contained therein to alter treatment to priority creditors without such creditors' express agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Montoya
  D. Utah· 2006-04-10· cited 41×
• Flynn v. Bankowski (Flynn)
  First Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 26×
• Ekeke v. United States
  S.D. Illinois· 1991-10-03· cited 21×
• In Re Northrup
  N.D. Iowa· 1991-11-12· cited 13×
• Austin v. Bankowski
  D. Massachusetts· 2014-09-25· cited 8×
• In re Shelton
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-09-14· cited 8×
• In Re Smith
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-02-06