D.C. Circuit· 11/18/2020
In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases
Citations
- 980 F.3d 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiffs in this litigation have met the pleading standard for an Eighth Amendment claim
- finding that a substantially similar claim stated a plausible Eighth Amendment method of execution claim
- pre- liminary injunction inquiry is a “decidedly far more searching inquiry” than motion to dismiss
- first quoting Monsanto, 561 U.S. at 156–57; and then quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)
- preliminary injunction inquiry is a “decidedly far more searching inquiry” than motion to dismiss
- noting the existence of “a governmental agreement to comply”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- John Doe v. University of Southern IndianaSeventh Circuit· 2022-08-08· cited 176×
- In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol CasesDistrict of Columbia· 2020-12-09
- In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol CasesDistrict of Columbia· 2020-12-30
- In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol CasesDistrict of Columbia· 2021-01-12
- N.S. v. HughesDistrict of Columbia· 2021-10-07
- Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, and Kelly Strong v. Anibal Canales and Ivan CantuTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2024-07-12
- Plastics Industry Association, Inc. v. BontaDistrict of Columbia· 2025-04-07
- Nyzier Fourqurean v. NCAASeventh Circuit· 2025-07-25
- Aragon v. RollinsDistrict of Columbia· 2026-06-22
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,484×
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1,413×
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,386×
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 956×
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 935×
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 922×
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court· 2015-06-29· cited 858×
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court· 1925-01-05· cited 673×
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 632×
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 452×
- Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court· 2019-04-01· cited 407×
- Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim GrahamD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 400×
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 398×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.