In re Farrell Publishing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no doubt that a litigant has 15 a duty to preserve evidence it knows or should know is relevant to imminent litigation.”
• like the attorney-client privilege, a party claiming 12 work product immunity has the burden of proving the applicability of the doctrine
• “[b]oilerplate objections such as ‘overly burdensome and harassing’ are improper”
• unexplained boilerplate objections are improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).