In Re: F. Elliot Siemon, F. Elliot Siemon, Debtor-Appellant v. Emigrant Savings Bank, Creditor-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the time limit prescribed by Rule 8002(a) is jurisdictional and that “in the absence of a timely notice of appeal in the district court, the district court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal”
• holding that a pro se litigant’s failure to comply with the filing deadlines for a notice of appeal set out in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002 meant that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the litigant’s appeal
• noting that untimely filings are a jurisdictional matter, even for pro se appellants
• observing that Rule 4(a)’s time limit is “mandatory and jurisdictional”
• “We therefore follow our sister circuits in holding that the time limit contained in Rule 8002(a
• “[I]n the absence of a timely notice of appeal . . . the district court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).