In re Ezeta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explanatory evidence “does not contradict or impugn the testimony on the part of the prosecution, but serves to explain it so as to show that the consequence otherwise deducible does not follow”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Extradition of Singh
  D. New Jersey· 1987-09-01· cited 10×
• Old Company's Lehigh, Inc. v. Meeker
  Second Circuit· 1934-06-04· cited 2×